Re: [PATCH 0 of 1] CVS retrieval of GLIBC cannot work for 2.10.1

[ng at piments dot com]

Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Hello Frederic!
> Hello All!
>
> On Wednesday 02 December 2009 02:28:16 Frederic Roussel wrote:
> > I've noticed that CVS retrieval for glibc cannot work, so I made a patch
> > to disable it in glibc.in.
>
> Don't bother hacking CVS in glibc, it's going away now that there are git
> trees available. CVS is already gone in my local copy, but as git is not
> yet ready, I haven't pushed the changes yet. Should be done by the end of
> the week...
>
> > That being said, the upstream project advertizes the use of "git" rather
> > than "cvs".
> > Is there any work going on to have "git" trees retrieved ?
>
> Yes, it's almost ready.
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.

Hi Yann,

could you confirm that previous installations fo ct-ng will still function?

I installed ct-ng just before you started moving to git and after a fair 
bit of work getting to know it I built a toolchain matched to my 
requirements.

Unless there are very important underlying reasons I do not intent to 
disrupt a working tested development system , however I do need to 
retain the possibility to recreate exactly the same thing should the 
need arise (fs corruption, whatever ).

I have enough work on my plate using ct-ng, I really do not have the 
time to learn git as well and start more learning curves and reinventing 
the wheel in order to remain where I am now with a working system.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting what this is about but it would be good if you 
could clarify.

Many thanks, Peter.

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq