This is the mail archive of the
crossgcc@sourceware.org
mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots
more information.
Thinking about ltrace-0.5.3
- From: Joachim Nilsson <jocke at vmlinux dot org>
- To: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann dot morin dot 1998 at anciens dot enib dot fr>
- Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:24:34 +0100
- Subject: Thinking about ltrace-0.5.3
Hi Yann!
I've been looking into integrating the latest ltrace, 0.5.3, with
crosstool-NG. It seems the maintainer has purged GNU Autotools from the
tree and is now using a home baked configure et al.
This _could_ mean a fundamental change to
scripts/build/debug/400-ltrace.sh, since --host and --build no longer
apply, or some clever special handling, similar to "if [ version -gt
0.5.3 ]", unless you decide to drop support for all prior ltrace versions?
How would you like to proceed? Maybe you have some similar
version-exception handling for other packages that you can recommend me
looking at.
The "heavy lifting" of adapting 0.5.3 to cross-building seems to be done
already by the openembedded guys, so it's more of a integration with
crosstool-NG issue.
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/ltrace/files
Regards
/Joachim
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq