This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote: > what do you think about the idea of directly using git repos > instead of standalone patches ? > how do you handle project not using git as their primary SCM ? Importing tarballs in repositories in pretty hackish. Having a single repo is out of question as git hardly scale. Moreover, that would require huge bandwidth for projects which provide a git tree. Linux tree should be +500M, (unofficial) gcc and glib are about 600M not check'et out. > My idea would be using an canonical repository layout (just like > my oss-qm repos) "oss-qm" ? > where ct-ng could checkout the appropriate trees > on package name and (normalized) version number. If someone likes > to have different sources (instead of now different patch dirs), > he would simply use another repository or ref prefix. > once again, everybody is not using git. - Arnaud note: I didn't discussed Yann's hg preference :) -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |