This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote: > But: then you've got now guarantee that the remaining will apply again. > You'll have to get a fresh upstream tree and apply them all manually > (unless you don't want to run the whole ct-ng machinery for half an > hour just to find out that some patches failed). And if some patches > failed, you'll have to manually replay the changes and diff them > out again. > > In the end, this goes down to an rebase operation again - regardless > if you're doing it manually or with the help of an proper vcs. > the effort should be spent getting the patch upstream, not finding a way to easily move 250 patches from rev A to rev B. Yes, that's a much more difficult effort. - Arnaud -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |