This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

LIBC_V_* or LIBC_GLIBC_V*

From: Esben Haabendal <eha at doredevelopment dot dk>
To: crossgcc at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:25:12 +0100
Subject: LIBC_V_* or LIBC_GLIBC_V*
References: <20101219102935.199720xttdwxy5tw@www.home.zuerker.org>

Hi,

Why did the change from LIBC_V_* to LIBC_GLIBC_V_* happen from glibc
2.11, and would a patch changing it to using the same prefix for all
glibc versions be accepted?

The current situation complicates integration of crosstool-ng as a
non-gui backend.

/Esben



--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LIBC_V_* or LIBC_GLIBC_V*
  - From: Bryan Hundven

References:
- patch to add glibc 2.12.x support
  - From: Heiko Zuerker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]