This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LIBC_V_* or LIBC_GLIBC_V*

From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven at gmail dot com>
To: Esben Haabendal <eha at doredevelopment dot dk>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:01:53 -0800
Subject: Re: LIBC_V_* or LIBC_GLIBC_V*
References: <20101219102935.199720xttdwxy5tw@www.home.zuerker.org> <1293805512.18787.368.camel@eha>

Esben, All,

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Esben Haabendal <eha@doredevelopment.dk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why did the change from LIBC_V_* to LIBC_GLIBC_V_* happen from glibc
> 2.11, and would a patch changing it to using the same prefix for all
> glibc versions be accepted?
>
> The current situation complicates integration of crosstool-ng as a
> non-gui backend.

I will submit a patch to correct this in a minute.

> /Esben
>
>
>
> --
> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
>
>

Thank you for reporting this issue!

-Bryan

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

References:
- patch to add glibc 2.12.x support
  - From: Heiko Zuerker
- LIBC_V_* or LIBC_GLIBC_V*
  - From: Esben Haabendal

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]