This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello again, I just finished a llllooonnnggg discussion from last October on what I believe is the same problem I am having now. Although after reading the whole thread, I don't believe a solution was agreed on by all those who were in on that discussion. If I followed the discussion enough it sounded like a patch of some sort was put in, but not to everyone's satisfaction. I am building on host=x86 Fedora 14, using ct-ng version 1.9.3. I am trying to build with the uClibc 0.9.30.3. library. All of this is for a PowerPC 405GPr target. I have attached all my config files. What is really interesting in all of this is...I have successfully built glibc and eglibc versions with identical configs! Just a change in the library selected...what I don't understand is that it is breaking in building the first static compiler. I don't know enough to understand if the selection of uClibc affects this so early in the build. Any thoughts? Based on the previous thread, I don't want to open up an old wound but I sure could take some help again. Regards, Chris
Attachment:
uClibc-0.9.30.config
Description: uClibc-0.9.30.config
Attachment:
build.log.bz2
Description: build.log.bz2
Attachment:
ctngconfig
Description: ctngconfig
-- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |