This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] debug/gdb: --disable-sim for CT_GDB_CROSS


On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN
<yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote:
> Zhenqiang, All,
>
> On Tuesday 22 November 2011 12:19:43 Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.chen@linaro.org>
>> # Date 1321604572 -28800
>> # Node ID 2d6b11f65d7cfa0802e2db9a23363d04be44eecd
>> # Parent ?a6c68712024f406df7d2da4af377f51982615833
>> debug/gdb: --disable-sim for CT_GDB_CROSS.
>>
>> sim was already disabled for CT_GDB_NATIVE.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Michael Hope
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.chen@linaro.org>
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/build/debug/300-gdb.sh b/scripts/build/debug/300-gdb.
>> --- a/scripts/build/debug/300-gdb.sh
>> +++ b/scripts/build/debug/300-gdb.sh
>> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --with-build-sysroot="${CT_SYSROOT_DIR}" ? ?\
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --with-sysroot="${CT_SYSROOT_DIR}" ? ? ? ? ?\
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --with-expat=yes ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?\
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ?--disable-sim ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? \
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --disable-werror ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?\
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "${cross_extra_config[@]}"
>
> Your mailer is mangling every patch, by adding a leading space to every
> line that start with a space, so the patches do not apply cleanly. I will
> be fixing that locally, no need to resend.
>
> Otherwise, I agree with Mike: Why is it needed to disable 'sim' in the
> cross-gdb? If the build is broken for some archs, it should rather be
> fixed. At least, disabling/enabling 'sim' should be a config option,
> so users that want to try and/or fix it have an easy way to.

I'd like to disable sim as it isn't useful when building for a GLIBC
target and it's one more thing to support.  ARM don't want to
distribute a binary simulator due to IP reasons which I must admit
I've never understood :)

How about a GDB_CROSS_EXTRA_CONFIG_ARRAY instead?  Disabling the
simulator is rare enough that it shouldn't be an option on it's own.

-- Michael

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]