This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote: > Florian, Bryan, All, > > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:35:21 Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:31:28 Yann E. MORIN wrote: >> > Florian, Bryan, All, >> > >> > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:06:43 Bryan Hundven wrote: >> > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > # HG changeset patch >> > > > # User Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> >> > > > # Date 1349256753 -7200 >> > > > # Node ID 7f6ddb2b0ca0d89fa5bc98c1deb55d840b505ccd >> > > > # Parent 43ace4bb005eef085437e3d4fbaef528ef0ef005 >> > > > [PATCH] libc/eglibc: add an option to enable obsolete RPC building >> > >> > Florian, OK, looks good :-) I will look at it tonight when back home. >> > Thank you! >> > >> > > Wouldn't this affect glibc-2.16 as well? In that case, it maybe better >> > > to put this in glibc-eglibc.sh-common, so when glibc-2.16 is added to >> > > ct-ng, it will just work (famous last words). >> > >> > Bryan, the code is already in glibc-eglibc-common, only the option is >> > specific to eglibc. >> > >> > We do not have glibc-2.16 yet in ct-ng. When/if someone pushes a patch to >> > add glibc-2.16, _then_ we can think of a way to move the option to the >> > common area. >> >> Bryan's concern looks valid to me, so if you want me to respin with this >> addressed, I really do not mind. > > In that case, please add: > config LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC > bool > > config LIBC_GLIBC_ENABLE_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC > bool > prompt "Enable obsoloete sunrpc" > depends on LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC > > Then (e)glibc versions that have support for obsoloete sunrpc can 'select' > the LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC symbol, and the option becomes visible. > > While you are at it, could you spin a patch that basically adds: > config LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC > bool > > comment "This version of (e)glibc does *not* have sunrpc" > depends on LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC > > Then (e)glibc (both 2.14 and 2.15, IIRC) versions that do not have sunrpc at > all can select the LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC symbol, and the warning becomes > visible. It should just be 2.15 and 2.16+ > Regards, > Yann E. MORIN. > > -- > .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. > | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | > | +0/33 662376056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ^ | > | --==< O_o >==-- '------------.-------: X AGAINST | /e\ There is no | > | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | (*_*) | / \ HTML MAIL | """ conspiracy. | > '------------------------------'-------'------------------'--------------------' -Bryan -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |