This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See crosstool-NG for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] libc/eglibc: add an option to enable obsolete RPC building


Hi Bryan, all,

On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:07:44 PM, Bryan Hundven wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Yann E. MORIN
> <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
> > Florian, Bryan, All,
> >
> > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:35:21 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:31:28 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> >> > Florian, Bryan, All,
> >> >
> >> > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:06:43 Bryan Hundven wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Florian Fainelli
> >> > > <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > # HG changeset patch
> >> > > > # User Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> >> > > > # Date 1349256753 -7200
> >> > > > # Node ID 7f6ddb2b0ca0d89fa5bc98c1deb55d840b505ccd
> >> > > > # Parent  43ace4bb005eef085437e3d4fbaef528ef0ef005
> >> > > > [PATCH] libc/eglibc: add an option to enable obsolete RPC
> >> > > > building
> >> >
> >> > Florian, OK, looks good :-) I will look at it tonight when back
> >> > home.
> >> > Thank you!
> >> >
> >> > > Wouldn't this affect glibc-2.16 as well? In that case, it
> >> > > maybe better
> >> > > to put this in glibc-eglibc.sh-common, so when glibc-2.16 is
> >> > > added to
> >> > > ct-ng, it will just work (famous last words).
> >> >
> >> > Bryan, the code is already in glibc-eglibc-common, only the
> >> > option is
> >> > specific to eglibc.
> >> >
> >> > We do not have glibc-2.16 yet in ct-ng. When/if someone pushes a
> >> > patch to
> >> > add glibc-2.16, _then_ we can think of a way to move the option
> >> > to the
> >> > common area.
> >>
> >> Bryan's concern looks valid to me, so if you want me to respin
> >> with this
> >> addressed, I really do not mind.
> >
> > In that case, please add:
> >     config LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC
> >         bool
> >
> >     config LIBC_GLIBC_ENABLE_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC
> >         bool
> >         prompt "Enable obsoloete sunrpc"
> >         depends on LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC
> >
> > Then (e)glibc versions that have support for obsoloete sunrpc can
> > 'select'
> > the LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC symbol, and the option becomes
> > visible.
> >
> > While you are at it, could you spin a patch that basically adds:
> >     config LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC
> >         bool
> >
> >     comment "This version of (e)glibc does *not* have sunrpc"
> >         depends on LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC
> >
> > Then (e)glibc (both 2.14 and 2.15, IIRC) versions that do not have
> > sunrpc at
> > all can select the LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC symbol, and the warning
> > becomes
> > visible.
> 
> It should just be 2.15 and 2.16+

Yann is right:
 - 2.13 contains end enables RPC by default,
 - 2.14 and 2.15 do not contain RPC at all,
 - 2.16 contains RPC but enables it only with --enable-obsolete-rpc.

Best regards,
BenoÃt

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]