Re: uClibc vs. eglibc size on ARM

[Khem Raj <raj dot khem at gmail dot com>]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:36:24AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > The minimal eglibc config for eglibc-1.16 (libm needed by gcc,
>> > the other options to un-break eglibc build):
>> >
>> > OPTION_EGLIBC_INET = y
>> > OPTION_EGLIBC_LIBM = y
>> > OPTION_EGLIBC_NSSWITCH = y
>> > OPTION_EGLIBC_RTLD_DEBUG = y
>> > OPTION_POSIX_C_LANG_WIDE_CHAR = y
>> > OPTION_POSIX_WIDE_CHAR_DEVICE_IO = y
>>
>> check option-groups.config file in eglibc's top build dir. I wonder if
>> others options were turned of or not.
>
> I started with all options off and then enabled them one by one
> until it built, looking at the failures to figure out which
> option might be responsible.   OPTION_EGLIBC_RTLD_DEBUG was
> the first one, which depends on OPTION_POSIX_WIDE_CHAR_DEVICE_IO
> which in turn depends on OPTION_POSIX_C_LANG_WIDE_CHAR.
> OPTION_EGLIBC_NSSWITCH and OPTION_EGLIBC_INET were next.
> OPTION_EGLIBC_LIBM is needed by gcc (eglibc itself builz
> without it).
>

and it did not change size of libc compared to when you have all options
on ? is that what you observed ?

> Johannes

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq