Re: Experienced opinion about the configuration is required.

[Mau Z <zmau1962 at gmail dot com>]

A better subject would be

Experienced opinion about the configuration is requested

Sorry,
Mau

On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Mau Z <zmau1962@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I am a newbie, so it took me a lot of time/attempts to build something
> which I considered simple at the beginning (once again, I am a
> newbie).
> If someone wants I can elaborate on the process (I do not know if this
> interests anyone).
>
>
> But, the process had "downgraded my piece of mind".
> So, I wonder if someone can give his/her opinion about the wisdom of
> the combination of choices made:
>
> *) Linux 3.4.47 + rt-patch 62   (kind of a must).
> *) crosstool-ng 1.18     (new, but not newest).
> *) gcc-4.7.3             (gcc-4.7.2 failed to build at some point, so
> I switched)
> *) glibc 2.14.1         (glibc 2.9 failed to build at some point, so I switched)
> *) binutils 2.22         (binutils 2.21 failed to build at some point,
> so I switched)
> *) gdb     6.8a
>
> Up until here, I generally know what are we talking about.
> Most of the next packages I have no idea what are they for........
> *) dmalloc 5.5.2
> *) duma  2_5_15
> *) ltrace   0.5.3
> *) strace   4.5.19
> *) GMP   4.3.2
> *) MPFR   2.4.2
> *) PPL   0.11                (All the others did not work, this was
> the last attempt after googeling the error message).
> *) CLOOG   0.15.10
> *) MPC   0.8.2
>
>
>
> A little bit of explanation :
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> The starting point was that I needed Linux 3.4 + RT Patch  (difficult
> to change). The best thing wold be Linux 3.4.47 + rt-patch 62  (proven
> to be working).
>
> crosstool-ng offers to work with Linux 3.4.25 which does not have an
> RT patch (So turned to my favorite version).
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Mau

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq