This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: -fnative-structure revisited.


On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:36:33PM +1100, Danny Smith wrote:
>I just stumbled across this is gcc 3.1 changelog:
>
>2002-02-05  Alexandre Oliva  <aoliva@redhat.com>
>
>	* target.h (struct gcc_target): Added ms_bitfield_layout_p.
>	* target-def.h (TARGET_MS_BITFIELD_LAYOUT_P): New.  Added to...
>	(TARGET_INITIALIZER): this.
>	* doc/tm.texi (TARGET_MS_BITFIELD_LAYOUT_P): Document.
>	(BITFIELD_NBYTES_LIMITED): Markup fix.
>	* tree.h (default_ms_bitfield_layout_p): Declare.
>	(record_layout_info): Added prev_field.
>	* tree.c (default_ms_bitfield_layout_p): New fn.
>	* c-decl.c (finish_struct): Disregard EMPTY_FIELD_BOUNDARY and
>	PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS for MS bit-field layout.
>	* stor-layout.c: Include target.h.
>	(start_record_layout): Initialize prev_field.
>	(place_field): Handle MS bit-field layout, and disregard
>	EMPTY_FIELD_BOUNDARY, BITFIELD_NBYTES_LIMITED and
>	PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS in this case.  Update prev_field.
>	* Makefile.in (stor-layout.o): Adjust dependencies.
>
>
>Essentially, it provides a hook to do what Donn Terry's -fnative-struct 
>patch did.  Has anyone tested this yet on cygwin or mingw?  AFAICT, the
>only target to use a non-default version of this hook is sh (see
>config/sh/sh.c) 

Does this mean that the layout defaults to MS automatically?

FWIW, I'm using a recent compiler from sourceware and it builds cygwin
just fine.

cgf


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]