This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 10:51, Christopher Faylor wrote: > You could make the same argument about cygwin-developers and cygwin, > though. Or even cygwin-patches and cygwin. I disagree that the same argument can be made in either case. cygwin users have no responsibilities within the project. Certainly, those users that track cygwin-developers will have a better idea of whats going on, but we don't care whether they have that idea or not. Package maintainers, are *meant* to track things such as setup.exe capabilities, and Cygwin API or behavioural changes (i.e. ntsec defaults) in order to carry out their package maintenance duties. Like I said though: I don't care. I'm not voting either way. I've said my 2c. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |