This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Pending package status (25 Jun 2003)
- From: Elfyn McBratney <elfyn at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 08:32:21 +0100
- Subject: Re: Pending package status (25 Jun 2003)
- References: <BAY2-F126lSt7IZfSp10000d245@hotmail.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> >8. Aspell
> >date : 07 Apr 2003
> >version: 0.50.3-1
> >status : not reviewed
> >notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
> > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
> >votes : 4 (Christopher, Elfyn, Gerrit and Igor)
> >url :
> >11. Aspell-en
> >date : 19 Jun 2003
> >version: 0.51.0-1
> >status : not (yet) reviewed
> >notes : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00161.html
> >url : http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
> > http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
> >votes : veto perhaps?
> Shouldnt really need votes - since without it aspell itself is pretty
What he said. :-)
> Can I encourage a 3rd party to review these two togeather? - multiple
> factors have conspired togeather that I am having difficulty getting the
> chance to do so.
Aaah, I forgot. The '(yet)' above was because I was reviewing it...I'll have
to finish that off later.
> Gareth - ponders if there was a setup.hint for aspell-en
setup.hint is referrenced here
> PS - if anyone is holding back on offering to maintain gcc based on the fact
> i suggested i wanted too - dont - it could be a while before i get my time
> back in order and have a chance to do anything again.