This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: TEST: patch-2.5.8-4 (package maintainers, please note)
David Rothenberger <email@example.com> writes:
> I don't think it's done through newlib headers. That was my thought
> initially, too, when I was investigating the patch problem, but I
> did run gcc -E on some source and the result still called fdopen.
Good, I was beginning to wonder ;-). After all users are allowed to
declare ISO-C functions themself without actually including any
headers [*], so just re-defining stuff in the headers wouldn't work.
[*] Of course doing so is not good practice, as users are going to
do it wrong, but that's not the point.