This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: non-setup information in setup.hint (was Re: Maintainers/Packages List, 2003-11-22)
On 2003-11-25T20:53+1100, Robert Collins wrote:
) I'm not sure why this is "non-setup" information. Both binary only (no
) source: entry for a package), and Maintainer are setup.ini fields.
Were you suggesting using Maintainer: and relying on setup to ignore it?
(Neither http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup-2.249.2.ini.html nor
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html seem to define a
The idea behind binary-only was to have some deliberate action, so we would
not have to rely on a lack of action. That is, a lack of source: could be
because the package is not built from sources, or it could be because the
packager left out external-source: (or forgot to upload a source package).
The current attributes I use in apps.xml are:
binary-only (no lack-of-source checks)
ignore-before=X (ignore new versions less than or equal to X)
ignore-freshmeat (for Cygwin-specific packages)
maintainer (just the name)
obsolete (binary-only+ignore-freshmeat+no out-of-date checks)
related-to=X (the directory this package goes in; libdb4.1-devel is
related-to db4.1, which is related-to db)
withhold (do not display in the PPL/MPL)
Plus, I include URLs, dates for proposals, votes, reviews, etc., but those
are probably things I should continue to maintain independently.
Daniel Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://naim-users.org/nmlorg/ http://naim.n.ml.org/
"I don't believe in making something user friendly just for the sake of
being user friendly, though; if you're decreasing the users' available
power, you're not really being all that friendly to them."