This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral
> I'm thinking of some people who'd want to use non-Cygwin tools to look at
> and debug the package source. NTEmacs comes to mind.
This is not a Cygwin application and I don't want to support it. And
besides that, you can still look at the source, though you should know
how managed mounts are working.
>> But then the cygwin xcoral maintainer tobe needs to wait until a new
>> upstream release is available? Using managed mounts solves this issue
>> in the best of all possible ways how to do s.th. like this.
> Well, I guess a managed mount is okay as an interim measure until the
> upstream package has the renamed file. But I'm uneasy about using this as
> a standard way to build a package.
Not as standard, probably this issue will be resolved in future
releases if the upstream maintainer is not one if those guys;)