This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: FAQ entries about emacs
On Feb 22 21:37, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> >>>>> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > Hi Volker,
> > can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is
> > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT
> > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ
> > entries is certainly outdated, but I'm not quite sure how to rephrase
> > them. What especially bugs me is the reference to X11 which, as far as
> > I know, is not correct for XEmacs. Maybe (but that's just a vague idea
> > from an Emacs non-user) it might be a good idea to pull the two FAQ
> > entries together into one "Is there a Cygwin port of Emacs?" and just
> > talk about XEmacs and GNU emacs, whatever the actual difference is.
> --- /o/download/faq-using.xml.orig 2009-02-22 20:36:51.078125000 +0100
> +++ /o/download/faq-using.xml 2009-02-22 21:34:36.359375000 +0100
> @@ -806,12 +806,50 @@
Thank you! Unfortunately I have a problem. The patch applies cleanly,
but the result doesn't build. The easy part was to fix the usage of
`&' in the screen sections, they just have to be converted to `&'.
But the really big problem is that the <para> and <itemizedlist> markers
are not correctly balanced. I tried to fix that myself, but it occured
to me that I'm not sure what your exact intention was. Can you have
another look, please?
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com