Re: FAQ entries about emacs

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

Hi Volker,

On Feb 22 21:37, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> >>>>> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> 
>     > Hi Volker,
>     > can you do me a favor?  Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is
>     > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT
>     > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ
>     > entries is certainly outdated, but I'm not quite sure how to rephrase
>     > them.  What especially bugs me is the reference to X11 which, as far as
>     > I know, is not correct for XEmacs.  Maybe (but that's just a vague idea
>     > from an Emacs non-user) it might be a good idea to pull the two FAQ
>     > entries together into one "Is there a Cygwin port of Emacs?" and just
>     > talk about XEmacs and GNU emacs, whatever the actual difference is.
> 
> --- /o/download/faq-using.xml.orig	2009-02-22 20:36:51.078125000 +0100
> +++ /o/download/faq-using.xml	2009-02-22 21:34:36.359375000 +0100
> @@ -806,12 +806,50 @@

Thank you!  Unfortunately I have a problem.  The patch applies cleanly,
but the result doesn't build.  The easy part was to fix the usage of
`&' in the screen sections, they just have to be converted to `&'.
But the really big problem is that the <para> and <itemizedlist> markers
are not correctly balanced.  I tried to fix that myself, but it occured
to me that I'm not sure what your exact intention was.  Can you have
another look, please?


Thank you,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat