Re: [RFU 1.5 and 1.7] libaprutil1-1.3.7

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Jun 30 09:02, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 6/30/2009 1:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Here, the aprutil1 package still exists in the 1.7 release area, but
>> I don't think it makes sense anymore, along the same lines as for
>> libapr1.  I think it should be ok to remove it from the 1.7 release.
>> What do you say?
>
> The aprutil1 and apr1 packages are just transition packages to help  
> people upgrade from the old package naming schema to the new one. They  
> don't need to be in the 1.7 area if we believe everyone will have  
> updated their apr1 and aprutil1 packages before they try to upgrade to  
> 1.7. I'm not sure that's true, though. It seems there are at least some  
> people that only update once every 3-5 years. :-)

So you'd rather have the apr1 package in the 1.7 release as well?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat