This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Python packages by maintainer
- From: Reini Urban <rurban at x-ray dot at>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:46:41 +0200
- Subject: Re: Python packages by maintainer
- References: <4B5EADFB.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20100126135611.GA2212@tishler.net> <4B5F54D1.email@example.com> <20100427220143.GC3692@tishler.net> <4BDB08A2.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20100430170340.GL5596@tishler.net> <4BF10457.email@example.com> <4C0564B1.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20100613010916.GA1416@tishler.net> <1276489838.5424.20.camel@YAAKOV04>
2010/6/14 Yaakov (Cygwin/X):
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 21:09 -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> Well, it's more "about" than "on," but I'm ready to release Python
>> 2.6.5-2 and promote it to current.
>> However, AFAICT, most of the above packages have not been rebuilt
>> against Python 2.6.5-1. ?Should I release and promote Python 2.6.5-2
>> anyways? ?Or, should I wait for more of the above to be updated first?
> Personally, my packages (both distro and Ports) are ready to go, and I'm
> getting tired of being in limbo. ?OTOH, things will break if we switch
> before everything else is ready.
> I'm most concerned about Jari's packages. ?bzr and mercurial are pretty
> important, and python-crypto, python-feedparser, and python-paramiko are
> dependencies of other packages. ?Unfortunately, the last we heard from
> him on this was not encouraging.
> I think we need some guidance from cgf and Corinna on this one: ?at what
> point can we say that a package has been orphaned, at least to the point
> that we can do a one-time NMU in order to not break the distro, if not
> an outright adoption?
I'm planning to get postgresql-9.0 ready. But I have problems
with my eyes, so I don't have that much time to work on this as I thought.
I hope next week it will be over and my right eye is functional again