This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [RFC] Packaging texlive
On 2/27/2012 5:51 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 18:10 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm thinking about volunteering to package texlive for Cygwin. It's
present in many (if not all) major Linux distros, and it could replace
the obsolete tetex package if the tetex maintainer doesn't object.
tetex is obsolete and needs to be replaced by TeX Live, no question.
Jan, I presume you won't mind if we relieve you of this cruft?
TeX Live also replaces psutils, listed as maintained by Daniel
Boesswetter. AFACIS he hasn't posted to these lists since November
2003, so I think it's fair to say that it's been orphaned.
Since Yaakov has already packaged texlive for Cygwin Ports, the obvious
question is whether he is planning to move it to the Cygwin distro. If
so, I would yield to him. If not, the main obstacle I see is that
texlive requires some packages (such as libpoppler, among others) that
are in Ports but not in Cygwin.
AFAICS the dependencies not yet in the distro are:
openjpeg (as dep of poppler)
python-imaging (aka PIL, for asymptote)
(*) poppler partially replaces xpdf, so this would require coordination
with Dr. Volker Zell.
I'll ITP those and work with Volker on trimming xpdf.
So the first question is whether it's feasible to move those packages to
the Cygwin distro in the near future. Yaakov, WDYT?
If you are interested and prepared to take this on, I'd be happy to work
with you to make this happen. First I suggest you review the brand-new
texlive cygclass and my .cygport files in Ports git:
I had already done that before sending my message. I've actually been
thinking for a couple years that I'd like to package texlive, but I
didn't have the nerve to try until I saw your work in Ports. Thanks!
Once we're ready, I can handle moving over the texlive packages, take
care of all the obsoletes, and adjust existing package dependencies,
then handoff to you for future maintenance.
Sounds like a good plan.