This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cygport suggestion: src_postinstall
On 3/11/2012 7:42 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2012-03-11 17:53, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/11/2012 8:52 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
If you don't like my suggestion of providing src_postinstall, then
I think there should be a different way for cygport users to have
some control over the postinstall process. What about defining
variables (like PREPEMACS, etc.) that allow the user to turn the
__prep* functions on or off?
If you don't like this suggestion either, what about the attached
patch? The rationale is that if the compile and install steps have
produced some byte-compiled files, then there's no reason for cygport
to step in and do more.
Just because *some* files have been byte-compiled doesn't mean that
*all* possible files have been. So what about using "--eval
(batch-byte-compile `true)" instead of "-f batch-byte-compile"? That
will ignore any files that have already been compiled.
That would solve the auctex problem, but I still prefer my version as a
general principle. It seems to me that you should give the package
maintainers and upstream developers the benefit of the doubt. If
they've byte-compiled some files but not all, I think you should assume
they have a reason. But it's your call, obviously.