This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:58:36 -0400
- Subject: upload protocol
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
Would it make sense to always wait for an "RFU" after an "ITP"?
As an uploader, I'd rather not have to scan conversations for clues
for when a package is ready for upload.
I was actually waiting for Jari to send an RFU for the packages that
he'd recently ITP'ed but, now that I think of it, maybe that's not
what we usually do.
I'd like to propose that we always require an RFU.