This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
- From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:59:16 -0500
- Subject: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
- References: <51643F10 dot 7000905 at gmail dot com> <87eheixuz8 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <20130410154730 dot GA404 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <516599BE dot 7090000 at gmail dot com> <51661EA2 dot 1070801 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <51665212 dot 6050101 at gmail dot com> <51665F0F dot 8040902 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <5166AD45 dot 8080809 at gmail dot com>
On 2013-04-11 07:32, Dave Korn wrote:
On 11/04/2013 07:58, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Your boehm-gc patch can replace my java-libgc-win32.patch, provided it
It appears to, libjava testsuite results are as good as they've ever been,
although I don't know whether or not the testsuite checks the invocation API.
It's certainly the more complete approach to take than just not supporting
the register/unregister methods, as confirmed by the fact that upstream
boehm-gc has implemented it for Cygwin.
There is a mistake in that patch. The DEBUG_CYGWIN_THREADS conditionals
need to be "if", not "ifdef", as elsewhere in the same source file.