This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [64 bit] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:10:20 +0200
- Subject: Re: [64 bit] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32
- References: <51A1AE43 dot 3070506 at gmail dot com> <20130527093451 dot GB2483 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51A5D4FA dot 1090304 at gmail dot com> <20130529102820 dot GA19456 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51A5DCE5 dot 30105 at gmail dot com> <20130529123328 dot GA23471 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51A64E03 dot 1070805 at gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On May 29 20:50, marco atzeri wrote:
> Il 5/29/2013 2:33 PM, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> >On May 29 12:48, marco atzeri wrote:
> >>Il 5/29/2013 12:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
>
> >>>Also, what about 1.7.19-7? The difference between -6, -7, and -8 is
> >>>exactly one patch per version. It might be interesting to learn about
> >>>the patch which, apparently, fixed the problem.
> >>
> >>I missed the 1.7.19-7 during my tests, do you need I test it ?
> >
> >It would be nice.
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Corinna
> >
>
> 1.7.19-7 is fine.
> 1.7.19-6 segfaults. Attached stackdump
> Stack trace:
> Frame Function Args
> 00000000006 0018006F9BB (00000000010, 00000229430, 003D8E10BA0, 00000000007)
> 00000000006 00180070E6A (000003F8550, 00600000000, 000000000E8, 00000000000)
> 00000229420 0018011A168 (00000000000, 000003F0230, 00180135D04, 000003F1320)
> 000000000C1 0018011723E (00000000000, 00600039530, 00000000000, 00000000000)
> 000011284C0 0018011770B (0000045CC70, 00600221010, 001800434ED, 00000000006)
> 000011284C0 001801178DC (00000000000, 00600221010, 000002297F8, 006002AA500)
> 000011284C0 00180117B9F (00000459850, 00000000000, 00600221D90, 00000000000)
> 000011284C0 00180146CA6 (00600000001, 00600221D90, 00000000041, 003D8E10BA0)
> 000011284C0 001800C0523 (006002AB770, 0000CE330C0, 006002AB770, 006002B1810)
> 000011284C0 00180113350 (0000CE330C0, 006002AB770, 006002B1810, 00000229B98)
> 000011284C0 00077492664 (006002118C8, 0000054DFBD, 006001D7A48, 0060024D050)
> 000011284C0 006002118C8 (0000054DFBD, 006001D7A48, 0060024D050, 006002118A8)
> 000011284C0 0060024D020 (006001D7A48, 0060024D050, 006002118A8, 006002118C8)
> 000011284C0 006002118C8 (0060024D050, 006002118A8, 006002118C8, 00600222310)
> 000011284C0 0000054DFBD (00010086CA1, 006002118C8, 006002399B0, 00001128460)
> 000011284C0 000100867AA (001800C0523, 006002AB3F0, 00000000001, 00000000001)
> End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present)
Thanks. Unfortunately I can't make hand nor foot of this stacktrace.
Oh well, maybe we should just skip the problem unless it reappears.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat