This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cygport upload command?
- From: Andrew Schulman <schulman dot andrew at epa dot gov>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 06:26:03 -0400
- Subject: Re: cygport upload command?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <slgmr9ha3gt7le8n3fq6i3cdin8m619phj at 4ax dot com> <slgmr9ha3gt7le8n3fq6i3cdin8m619phj-e09XROE/p8c at public dot gmane dot org> <53BB91AB dot 1020507 at cygwin dot com> <03bp3ahlhtjnlcul673ol1dm88jgpvl46u at 4ax dot com> <03bp3ahlhtjnlcul673ol1dm88jgpvl46u-e09XROE/p8c at public dot gmane dot org> <20141014083251 dot GA18208 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
> Minor nit: This should be `cygport upload' to be in line with the
> other cygport commands. Alternatively, cygport could introduce a
> two-letter abbreviation scheme, for instance:
>
> cygport download -> cygport dl or (rcs-like) co
> cygport prep -> cygport pr
> cygport build -> cygport mk or cc
> cygport install -> cygport in
> cygport package -> cygport pk
> cygport upload -> cygport up or (rcs-like) ci
I didn't say so, but yes, the command is named and described everywhere as
'cygport upload'. 'cygport up' also works. I didn't think of 'cygport
ci', but that's a good idea.