This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Aug 29 18:50, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > On 08/26/2016 01:49 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 26 13:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > Apart from these minor bits and pieces, I really like this new > > pathfinder class, btw. > > Thank you! :) > > While at it: Combining dlopen thoughts with the "forkables" background > around replacing dlls-in-use leads me to this thought for redundant > calls of dlopen: > > As we've already agreed that GetModuleHandleEx might make sense, Erm... where exactly did we do that? I recall I mentioned using LoadLibraryEx with LOAD_LIBRARY_SEARCH_USER_DIRS and the AddDllDirectory functions, but I don't think we talked about GetModuleHandleEx. The question is if it really makes sense to add calls to GetModuleHandleEx. Apart from slowing down the dlopen call, it seems unnecessary. Assuming you call LoadLibrary with the same paths and same extensions in the same order, wouldn't a second call to dlopen have the exact same result (loading the same file)? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |