This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again)

To: cygwin-patches at Cygwin dot Com
Subject: Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again)
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:30:15 -0400
References: <20010910044816.4205.qmail@web14509.mail.yahoo.com> <20010910135122.A13759@redhat.com> <20010910135605.A15863@redhat.com> <3B9D03AC.4E648C07@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-patches at Cygwin dot Com

On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:17:16PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >I'm not wild about using something called NONAMELESSUNION to control
>> >whether a nameless *structure* is defined but I guess it's ok.
>
>Never the less, the MSDN will have the control on how this is
>implemented if it applies in this case.  Or is NONAMELESSUNION something
>we've made up along the way?

I just checked.

It's a Microsoft invention and the use it the same way, so I guess
we're "good company".

cgf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again)
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again)
  - From: Christopher Faylor

References:
- _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again)
  - From: Danny Smith
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again)
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again)
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again)
  - From: Earnie Boyd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]