This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-patches
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [PATCH] cygcheck: follow symbolic links
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:29:59 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] cygcheck: follow symbolic links
- References: <20060216160637.GQ26541@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0602161116540.22053@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <20060217113100.GT26541@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0602170900350.1592@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0602221335110.4972@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <20060223112956.GF4294@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0602230913440.13565@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0607191036580.13093@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <20060724111402.GG11991@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0609280901120.15013@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
- Reply-to: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
Igor,
On Sep 28 09:06, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> [...]
> > The latest fax was about this change, so I think this should still be
> > covered, shouldn't it? Ping the guy nevertheless. We should stay on
> > the safe side in legal questions.
> >[...]
> Looks like I've been remiss in following up on this, though I regenerated
> the patch that same day. Attached is the new version of the patch. I
> believe "the fax" (the new one) has been sent, but I've received no
> notification of that, presumably because Corinna is not around...
> Igor
I didn't receive any notification either, so this somehow got stuck on
one side. I'm going to check my side, would you mind to ping yours?
As soon as that's clarified, I'll apply your patch.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat