This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] <asm/byteorder.h> missing prototypes warning

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:18:04 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] <asm/byteorder.h> missing prototypes warning
References: <49D57E45.4000409@users.sourceforge.net> <20090403082635.GB27898@calimero.vinschen.de>

Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> Wouldn't it be better to move newlib's _ELIDABLE_INLINE definition to
> some nicely matchin header like _ansi.h and then use it wherever it
> fits?

  I think you're right.  Can one of you two please take care of it?  I've got
a bit of a load on right now what with gcc back in stage1.

    cheers,
      DaveK

References:
- [PATCH] <asm/byteorder.h> missing prototypes warning
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: [PATCH] <asm/byteorder.h> missing prototypes warning
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]