This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-patches
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Building for nocygwin
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:06:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: Building for nocygwin
- References: <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9CFD0@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <CA+sc5m=cKU5DaZFeJuEas-nfXD9uAsxq4V_9hcoUAM77u3OKNA@mail.gmail.com> <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9CFEF@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <CA+sc5m=mC16bBFTBpPACoewcxKWt4KSsH22mUiVu0BrYCVObyQ@mail.gmail.com> <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9D004@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <20120423140440.GG7097@calimero.vinschen.de> <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9D01E@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <20120423153719.GB1133@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4F95AEF4.7040407@users.sourceforge.net>
- Reply-to: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:35:16PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On 2012-04-23 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>>> I *get* that. My problem was, the web is so cluttered with pages mentioning
>>> the no-cygwin thing (including the cygwin FAQ!) that finding a good howto is
>>> nearly impossible.
>>>
>>> Is there a deep reason not to amend the FAQ?
>>
>> No, there is no reason not to change the FAQ.
>>
>> Could someone provide some appropriate words?
>
>Patch attached.
Thanks very much. Please check in (with typo correction mentioned in
followon mail).
I suspect that we'll probably need to flesh this out over time but at
least we aren't suggesting the use of a deprecated compiler option now.
cgf