This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: Implement CPU_SET(3) macros


Hi Mark,

On Jul  1 01:55, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jun 30 15:59, Mark Geisert wrote:
> > > This patch supplies an implementation of the CPU_SET(3) processor
> > > affinity macros as documented on the relevant Linux man page.
> > > ---
> > >   winsup/cygwin/include/sys/cpuset.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >   winsup/cygwin/sched.cc             |  8 ++--
> > >   2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > [...]
> > > +#define CPU_SETSIZE  1024  // maximum number of logical processors tracked
> > > +#define NCPUBITS     (8 * sizeof (__cpu_mask))  // max size of processor group
> > > +#define CPU_GROUPMAX (CPU_SETSIZE / NCPUBITS)  // maximum group number
> > > -#define __CPUELT(cpu)   ((cpu) / __NCPUBITS)
> > > -#define __CPUMASK(cpu)  ((__cpu_mask) 1 << ((cpu) % __NCPUBITS))
> > > +#define CPU_WORD(cpu) ((cpu) / NCPUBITS)
> > > +#define CPU_MASK(cpu) ((__cpu_mask) 1 << ((cpu) % NCPUBITS))
> > 
> > I wouldn't do that.  Three problems:
> > [...]
> > There's also the request from Sebastian on the newlib list to
> > consolidate the cpuset stuff from RTEMS and Cygwin into a single
> > definition.
> > [...]
> I've also found that taskset isn't working properly on my build system with
> the new CPU_SET code, though my other testcases are.  So even as submitted,
> and fixed per your comments here, there's a bit more to be done.
> 
> ..mark

any chance to pick this up again?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]