This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Michael, On Jul 30 17:22, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Hi, > > following up https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2019-q2/msg00155.html > > It turns out that fixup_shms_after_fork does require the child pinfo to > be "remember"ed, while the fork retry to be silent on failure requires > the child to not be "attach"ed yet. > > As current pinfo.remember performs both "remember" and "attach" at once, > the first patch does introduce pinfo.remember_without_attach, to not > change current behaviour of pinfo.remember and keep patches small. > > However, my first thought was to clean up pinfo API a little and have > remember not do both "remember+attach" at once, but introduce some new > remember_and_attach method instead. But then, when 'bool detach' is > true, the "_and_attach" does feel wrong. I'd prefer to drop the reattach call from remember, calling both of them where appropriate. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |