This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: flex and dos source files. How is flex built for cygwin
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:51:05 -0500
- Subject: Re: flex and dos source files. How is flex built for cygwin
- References: <419E499B.4040007@mvista.com> <6.1.0.6.0.20041119143038.04e7a008@pop.prospeed.net> <419E52C1.6030604@mvista.com> <419E5922.9060501@mvista.com> <419EFB39.8020005@x-ray.at> <29A01F5A-3B11-11D9-84CE-000D932D0448@rehley.net> <419F8AA5.9040009@x-ray.at> <D36FEE26-3B25-11D9-AD1D-000D932D0448@rehley.net> <Pine.GSO.4.61.0411221215291.20353@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:21:55PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> He is using automode.o, he said in one of the followups to this thread.
>
>...and that should have ended it. I don't know why a simple question of
>"how exactly was the distributed flex binary built?" raised so many
>off-topic responses.
Thanks, Igor. I actually thought that I missed something. I couldn't
figure out why there was so much churning after I mentioned automode. I
really couldn't see why I had to offer this at all since the OP seemed
to be satisfied with the textmode response.
cgf