This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Spice on cygwin?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:54:50 -0400
- Subject: Re: Spice on cygwin?
- References: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D03E04F9F@exchange.timesys.com>
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:40:59AM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote:
>> " BECAUSE AUTOTOOLS IS A SCREAMING INSANE MESS OF NIGHTMARE GIBBERISH
>> SPAGHETTI NONSENSE THAT WILL SUCK EVERY LAST DROP OF SANITY OUT OF
>> YOUR BRAIN WITH A STRAW AND LEAVE YOU REELING, DROOLING AND GIBBERING
>> IN A CORNER DRESSED IN RAGS AND ROLLING IN YOUR OWN FAECES. "
>What's truly and honestly amazing is this is one of the more
>*restrained* comments I've ever seen made about autotools.
>BTW, is there any truth to the rumors that the autotools maintainers
>are, in fact, also the primary authors of the US tax code? You have to
>admit, that would answer a *lot* of questions about both, um,
Hmm. I think I see an opening for a major new product.
I envision something called "TurboConf" that costs about $79.95 and
leads you through the complicated process of forcing a program to use
autoconf/automake. We could set a tech support hotline, have
interactive web chat support, etc.
This could be huge.