This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Any chance to get Apache 2.0.xx working on cygwin?
- From: One Angry User <angry at lusers dot org>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Maligning List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:00:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Any chance to get Apache 2.0.xx working on cygwin?
- References: <email@example.com> <20050616212135.GB11157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: Blaaab Babble Boogle Bop <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor's computer deigned to emit the following stream of bytes:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Andreas Eibach wrote:
> >firstname.lastname@example.org schrieb am 16.06.05 17:03:10:
> Actually, that was email@example.com who schrieb:
> >>>site:cygwin.com inurl:cygwin inurl:ml <query words here>
> >>>You can even use more "inurl:"s to restrict by year/month since those
> >>>are part of the URL. In addition, the list is archived at many other
> >>>places, all of which have searches. Three that come to mind are
> >>>gmane.org, marc.theaimsgroup.com, and mail-archive.com.
> >>I'm glad that someone finally suggested this. I think a few more
> >>messages along these lines would have surely kick started a mean
> >>response from me.
> >Pity it didn't come. I would have been able to answer accordingly,
> >mind you. I cannot understand why you are always so short-tempered if
> >someone reports a problem. But if you want war, you get war if need
> Can't talk now. I'm digging trenches.
Those won't save you from falling hippos. :-p