This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Who hasn't been badly flamed?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 23:51:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: Who hasn't been badly flamed?
- References: <20050907140737.GB30741@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050909021636.70A874A805F@cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:16:22PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> From: Christopher Faylor
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:36:19PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >[snip]
>>>It is funny sometimes what people consider to be a "flame". Sometimes
>>>people do rude or inconsiderate things which, while lacking any
>>>vituperative language can, nonetheless serve as fodder for an aggrieved
>>>reaction. The original mailer can fall back on "I didn't say anything"
>>>but, in reality, they are just trolls. I think I'll take a good flame
>>>over a troll any day.
>>
>>Hookay, let's just save this one up for future use, shall we? ;-)
>
>Huh? Are you taking something in the above personally?
>
>No Chris, you've misunderstood my comment. I know a guy who does
>exactly what you describe on a periodic basis[1]. Sometimes it sounds
>like he doesn't even realize he does it, though I'm pretty sure he
>does. At any rate, by "save this one up for future use", I simply
>meant that, should the opportunity present itself, showing him your
>exposition may be instructive and/or informative to him.
Ah. So, I still didn't have this quite right.
After my coffee, I had thought that you were implying that you were
going to remind me of my preference for "flaming over trolling" the next
time you indulged in a flame. I thought you might have been poking a
little bit of fun at yourself rather than (my original impression)
taking something I said personally. I apologized because I thought you
were doing something sort of self-deprecating and I'd initially missed
it. Thanks for setting me straight and apologies for still getting it
wrong. I haven't been getting much sleep lately and it is beginning to
show.
You have a good idea there. I think I'll hold onto my apology for
similar reasons. The next time I come up against someone who refuses to
admit any fault I can use my message as an example of how someone who
thinks they made a mistake can honestly apologize for it rather than
trying to cover up or ignore it.
>[1] I think; I still don't know what "vituperative" means. I gotta buy
>myself a dictionary one of these days.
I use dictionary.reference.com, myself. I even checked that I was using
vituperative the way I meant to when I used the above.
Actually, now that I think of it, I keep meaning to switch to
en.wiktionary.org.
References below.
I'm glad that we're finally starting to get along, btw. I do think
highly of your technical ability and, as you know, I've always
appreciated your sense of humor.
cgf
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vituperative
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=vituperative
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=erudite
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/erudite