This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: [RFU] lftp 3.5.1
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:24:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFU] lftp 3.5.1
- References: <OFC7667BE3.9F69682A-ON8525717F.00650A31-852571B6.002DAEE5@epamail.epa.gov> <20060725084927.GA27575@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0607250859010.17655@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <20060725135145.GA30925@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0607250955030.17655@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <ea5c38$c51$2@sea.gmane.org>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:07:20AM -0500, mwoehlke wrote:
>Igor Peshansky wrote:
>>On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>On Jul 25 09:00, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>>On Jul 25 04:18, Schulman.Andrew@XXXXXXX.XXX.XXX wrote:
>>>>Ahem.
>>>Sorry.
>>>
>>>*mumbling something about mutt using the email address if the user's
>>>full name is not given in the "From:" header.
>>
>>*mumbling something about pine doing the same by default, but being
>>configurable enough to customize that behavior.
>
>...and I thought the consensus was that if someone wants to post their
>e-mail address as their name, they deserve having it quoted? :-) (In
>these cases, if I reply, I usually leave a note to the OP suggesting
>that they fix this on their end.)
That is what I resolved a while ago. It's either that or switch to
another email client and I've gotten used to mutt. I haven't
investigated the features in the latest mutt, though. Maybe it's
possible to do the right thing in this type of situation, now.
cgf