This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Cygintl-3.dll was not found
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:53:56 -0400
- Subject: Re: Cygintl-3.dll was not found
- References: <58fb98730601070837k26ad68f5l@mail.gmail.com> <43BFEFB9.EA24C5B4@dessent.net> <5718434.post@talk.nabble.com> <003001c6bb9a$4e15b140$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <5732487.post@talk.nabble.com> <20060809210958.GA3815@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <ebdnsr$fu$1@sea.gmane.org>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:34:02PM -0500, mwoehlke wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:38:47PM -0700, infoterror wrote:
>>>Under windows, programs are installed by default in "C:\Program Files."
>>>cygwin's preferred "c:\cygwin" is foolish and makes an unnecessary mess
>>>of installations.
>>
>>I disagree. Not all packages install in "c:\Program Files" and putting
>>Cygwin's root directory there would mean extra typing, potential
>>"filename with spaces" problems, and, most importantly, it would mean 10
>>extra characters eaten from the MAX_PATH limit. Also, as is pointed out
>>later in this thread, there is a whole filesystem underneath the
>>c:\cygwin directory. Right or wrong, I've always considered Cygwin to
>>be sort of a parallel to the Windows directory.
>>
>>You can, of course, choose your own location, however. I don't see why
>>this should be a big issue for anyone who installs Cygwin. If they know
>>about "c:\Program Files" and think that's the place that cygwin should
>>go, they are welcome to put things there.
>>
>>What kind of problems do you think are being caused by installing to
>>"c:\cygwin" and/or what kind of problems would be solved by installing
>>to "c:\Program Files\cygwin"?
>
>Whew. Thanks for wording that better than what I was managing. :-)
Thanks.
So what kind of response would you expect to my mail? More "thin
intelligence", "foolish" responses?
>...And for better or worse, Cygwin isn't breaking any rules Microsoft
>themselves haven't broken.
Yeah there is that and I resisted the urge to say something about
foolish consistencies, too.
cgf