This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: 1.5.21-1: sshd: "child_copy: linked dll data write copy failed" after computer reboot (Windows 2000 SP4)
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:49:53 -0500
- Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: sshd: "child_copy: linked dll data write copy failed" after computer reboot (Windows 2000 SP4)
- References: <45523EE3.email@example.com> <200611082044.kA8Kicn9025313@www.harkless.org>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:44:38PM -0800, Dan Harkless wrote:
>On November 8, 2006, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Thread TITTTL'd
>I'm not subscribed to that list, so will not see any replies unless you
>CC me. (And not sure if this is going to get through.)
>>Dan Harkless wrote:
>>>The thing is, I'm not willing to globally configure my mailer to not
>>>use the email address on the attribution line, and it's non-trivial to
>>>get it to only do that when responding to this list.
>>Why on earth not? Does the vast majority of your mail really consist
>>of forwards where you need the recipient to know the e-mail address of
>>the person that sent the original? Other than this, I can't think of a
>>good reason why you would include addresses in a reply.
>Not the vast majority, no, but it comes up more often than I post to
>mailing lists with public archives that munge addresses in the header
>but not the body.
More discussion of this fascinating topic.