This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: XFree86 display drivers
- To: "Robert Campbell" <rob@geonexuscorp.com>, <cygwin-xfree@sourceware.cygnus.com>
- Subject: Re: XFree86 display drivers
- From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 14:56:44 -0400
- References: <000e01bea7a9$36643100$1605a8c0@lyra.geonexuscorp.com>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cygwin-xfree-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
> > [mailto:cygwin-xfree-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com]On Behalf Of Suhaib M.
> > Siddiqi
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 1999 12:21 PM
> > To: cygwin-xfree@sourceware.cygnus.com
> > Subject: XFree86 display drivers
> >
> >
> > Following is a suggestion from Jan Rouvillain:
> >
> > -----
> > Do we really need the SVGA S3 server and so on. I mean, that Windows 9X/NT
> > already have a SVGA driver running. Furthermore, I think we will get in
> > serious problems if two display drivers are competing for the graphic
> > ressource. Only one driver can run, because only one driver can
> > receive the
> > interrupts from the graphic card.
> > ---------
> AGREED! Since WinDoze already is already using a video driver, I don't see
> the need to duplicate one, or try to run a second. Also, This allows us
> (hopefully) the ability to run on top of windoze, and to take advantage of a
> far greater set of video drivers/etc.
>
I agreed too with Jan. How to do it, I had been thinking since long time.
Suhaib
> > Before we start writing or hacking display driver codes in
> > CFree86, I would like to hear
> > opinions from other users on how to handle this.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Suhaib
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>