This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
RE: suggestion
- To: <cygwin-xfree at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: RE: suggestion
- From: "Chris Nappi" <ra5809 at email dot sps dot mot dot com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 15:33:39 -0500
>On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 08:15:01AM -0400, Suhaib Siddiqi wrote:
>>
>> It cannot be integrated in core distribution of Cygwin. Because of
>> conflicting
>> GPL ad X licenses, it took me months to pursue XF86 board members to at
>> least integrate
>> Cygwin related patches in XF86. We are allowed to distribute binaries
and
>> sources
>> separate of Cygwin, but officially integrating XF86 in Cygwin will start
>> arguments
>> with XF86 board members and may result in throwing away Cygwin support.
>>
>> Therefore, answer is no. Cygwin/XFree86 will always exists an open
source
>> separate project.
>> Binaries will be covered under GPL because they link to Cygwin1.dll, but
>> XF86 sources will
>> be under X Consortium license, which means if you could get it compile
>> without Cygwin1.dll
>> linking then your binaries will not be under GPL... which is fair enough.
>That's a somewhat weird decision of the X Consortium. Putting the
>package into the Cygwin distro doesn't change the licensing terms
>of the sources.
>Jus as example, the OpenSSH sources aren't suddenly GPL'd only
>due to the fact that they are in the same directory as the OpenSSH
>Cygwin binaries. They will of course remain BSD licensed.
>Corinna
>--
>Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
>Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
>Red Hat, Inc.
It seems to me that including a serparate package with a different license
in the setup program would not violate the XF86 board's concerns. Projects
do that all the time.
Chris