This is the mail archive of the cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Starting web site updates


Hi,

OK, OK, I'll be more world-centric ;-)
I'm just trying to help you to make the best X for the whole world, and, you
know, I'm very, very happy that this project starts to look for foreign (for US
citizen I mean ;-) ) keyboards.
I'm following it for more 3 years and waiting for this keyboard problem since
the beginning.
I can't find any time for developping (Be sure I regret that, I'd love to) but I
can spend some time testing at work.

But I still don't understand why xev gives a good result and not the direct
typing in a xterm. Do you have any explaination how it is possible ?

CU
.                         \)|(/
.                         (o o)
. /-----------------ooO----(_)----Ooo-----------------\
.(_|                  Francis VIVAT                   |
.  |                    CETP-CNRS                     |
.  |  10-12, avenue de l'Europe  78140 Velizy         |
.  |             Tel    : +33 1 3925 4780             |
.  |             Fax    : +33 1 3925 4922             |_
.  |      E-Mail : francis.vivat@cetp.ipsl.fr         | )
.  \---------------------------------------------------/
.                        (_)  (_)



----- Original Message -----
From: "Harold Hunt" <huntharo@msu.edu>
To: "'Francis VIVAT'" <francis.vivat@cetp.ipsl.fr>
Cc: <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
Sent: jeudi 12 avril 2001 18:49
Subject: RE: Starting web site updates


> Francis,
>
> Well, I'm trying not to be US-centric, so you'll have to try not to be
> Euro-centric :)  Note that Windows does not generate a fake Control_L press
> for non-European keyboards.
>
> Alexander's Test 5 does not handle the Control_L key quite correctly.  I use
> Control_L all the time in emacs, so having a broken Control_L key just isn't
> going to cut it.
>
> We're not going to solve this problem halfway, only to have to solve it
> again later.  Rather, we are looking for a complete solution that will fix
> the problem for good; thus the discussion on the list.
>
> Harold
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]