Re: Problem with 2 IPs

["Giorgio" <topo1971 at tiscalinet dot it>]

Here we are...

OS Version: Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Querying devices using ioctl
lo: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=127.0.0.1
eth0: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=10.10.3.100

but actualy my main IP is 192.168.184.14 !!!

I am not using a Token ring though.
Someone asked me to change the routing table according to my
IP configuration. I have no clue why I should cope with this table since i
am afraid it's a binding
problem, not a routing problem...

I tried to see in depth what's going on...
Actually packets are sent through the correct IP...

D:\Network\Sniffer\WinDump>windump -n src 192.168.184.14 and dst
192.168.184.205
windump: listening on\Device\Packet_{3A98A0F1-A580-427F-8835-96545B91B723}
12:15:43.285133 arp who-has 192.168.184.205 tell 192.168.184.14
12:15:43.300499 192.168.184.14.2079 > 192.168.184.205.177:  udp 7
12:15:43.939556 192.168.184.14.2079 > 192.168.184.205.177:  udp 66
12:15:43.952719 192.168.184.14.2079 > 192.168.184.205.177:  udp 29
12:15:45.951915 192.168.184.14.2079 > 192.168.184.205.177:  udp 29
12:15:49.957661 192.168.184.14.2079 > 192.168.184.205.177:  udp 29
12:15:57.959307 192.168.184.14.2079 > 192.168.184.205.177:  udp 29

But the X server seems to use another IP...
Fatal server error:
XDMCP fatal error: Session failed Session 36 failed for display
10.10.3.100:0: Cannot open display

I tried hopelessy to export the class A display... no result obviously...
Making sure that Cygwin use the correct interface... i tried to ping and to
telnet to the machine...

12:25:02.299126 arp who-has 192.168.184.205 tell 192.168.184.14
12:25:02.301545 192.168.184.14 > 192.168.184.205: icmp: echo request
12:25:03.292363 192.168.184.14 > 192.168.184.205: icmp: echo request
12:25:04.293716 192.168.184.14 > 192.168.184.205: icmp: echo request
12:25:19.750080 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: S 3288006611
12:25:19.750708 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: . ack 252901
12:25:19.752400 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: P 0:27(27) a
12:25:19.775340 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: P 27:39(12)
12:25:19.886047 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: . ack 31 win
12:25:19.889427 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: P 39:98(59)
12:25:20.086335 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: . ack 73 win
12:25:20.088100 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: P 98:104(6)
12:25:20.286638 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: . ack 89 win
12:25:22.363498 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: P 104:105(1)
12:25:22.489809 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: . ack 91 win
12:25:23.557668 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: P 105:106(1)
12:25:23.691528 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: . ack 93 win
12:25:24.869564 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: P 106:107(1)
12:25:24.993421 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: . ack 97 win
12:25:25.532594 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: P 107:108(1)
12:25:25.539427 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: . ack 102 wi
12:25:25.540845 192.168.184.14.2099 > 192.168.184.205.23: F 108:108(0)

it works fine...

I am sort of lost...
do you guys think it might be a Xfree86/Cygwin or a W2k bug?

/G