This is the mail archive of the cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Problem with 2 IPs


didn't need to xpost all messages to the mailing list
since i didn't think a 'flame' could interest other people...

After all i didn't ask you to resolve my problem...

Do not feel obliged to reply to my messages from now on... :)

/G

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harold Hunt" <huntharo@msu.edu>
To: "Giorgio" <topo1971@tiscalinet.it>
Cc: "cygx" <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:27 PM
Subject: RE: Problem with 2 IPs


> Open source projects are what YOU make of them.
>
> Nuff said.
>
> Harold
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Giorgio [mailto:topo1971@tiscalinet.it]
> > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 4:17 AM
> > To: Harold Hunt
> > Subject: Re: Problem with 2 IPs
> >
> >
> > Harold,
> >
> > I might know more than you about IP suite protocols... but you know
> > more than be about cygwin/xfree86.
> > The reason I posted in the mailing list, beside asking if it was a
> > well-known
> > problem, was to look for a source code support (read: is the class
> > doing this or doing that... am i wrong doing this or doing that).
> > Hence... if you can't even support me describing the XFCYG architecture
> > or you can't give me hints where to start to dig in tons of code...
> > ...this means that the mailing list is useless for me as well as
> > XFCYG, and
> > it's not really what people expect form an open-source project
> > (read: cooperation and knowledge sharing).
> >
> > Thanks anyway
> > /G
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Harold Hunt" <huntharo@msu.edu>
> > To: "Giorgio" <topo1971@tiscalinet.it>
> > Cc: "cygx" <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:33 PM
> > Subject: RE: Problem with 2 IPs
> >
> >
> > > Giorgio,
> > >
> > > > Having multiple IP addresses with *different* address space
> > is perfectly
> > > > legal... and it's NOT an invalid card configuration.
> > > > No need to mention all the NAT, HA protocols, gateway
> > protocols, virtual
> > > > servers...
> > > > They all allow (even require) to use two or more IP addresses on the
> > same
> > > > physical interface.
> > >
> > > My point being that if you disagree, then you know more than us about
IP
> > and
> > > you're on your own.
> > >
> > > > > So, I'm going to say here that you are trying to do
> > something that is
> > > > bound
> > > > > to fail, thus, don't expect any help from us, as we are
> > mere mortals.
> > > >
> > > > Not a very professional reply.
> > >
> > > I beg to differ.
> > >
> > > Harold
> > >
> >
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]