This is the mail archive of the cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: problems with xfree


Do you think we could alternatively call these XFree86.* ?

Harold

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com
> [mailto:cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com]On Behalf Of Jehan
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:22 PM
> To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: problems with xfree
>
>
> Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 04:47:39PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let me see if I understand what is going on here:
> >>>
> >>> We are debeating whether to:
> >>>
> >>> 1) Modify /etc/profile, which is not installed via a package, but is
> >>> created directly by setup.exe.
> >>>
> >>> 2) Add two scripts, one for bash-style shells and one for
> >>> c-shell-style shells to /etc/profile.d/.  These scripts are processed
> >>> by /etc/profile.  We would add this new scripts to an XFree86
> >>> package, probably XFree86-bin, and we would install these scripts via
> >>> a post-install script if they were not already present (so we do not
> >>> overwrite modifications).
> >>>
> >>> Of all the arguments for/against the two methods, so far only one
> >>> seems to be a sticking point that essentially decides how we will do
> >>> this:
> >>>
> >>> There is no guarantee that the sub-script in /etc/profile.d/ that
> >>> adds /usr/X11R6/bin to the path will be executed before some other
> >>> shell script, that may be added at a later date to /etc/profile.d/,
> >>> that requires that the path to the X11R6 binaries already be set.  In
> >>> order to allow other scripts in /etc/profile.d/ to assume that the
> >>> path to the X11R6 binaries is known, we must set the path to the
> >>> binaries in /etc/profile before the /etc/profile.d/ scripts are
> >>> processed.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't know what this "other" script in /etc/profile.d might be, but
> >> if it is a problem for the "other" script, it could easily include
> >> /etc/profile.d/add_x11_path (or whatever) to add the script to ensure
> >> that the path was properly set.
> >>
> >> So, I think that adding an appropriate file to /etc/profile.d makes
> >> more sense.  Then people who don't have /usr/bin/X11R6 don't have
> >> a spurious check for the directory in their /etc/profile.
> >>
> >> cgf
> >
> >
> > That sounds even more reasonable.  No one has suggested that yet.
> >
> > One question though... are there any known packages that put a
> script in
> > /etc/profile.d/ that expect the path to the X11R6 binaries to
> already be
> > set, but that do not include some X11R6 path-setting script?  We would
> > have to modify any such scripts, if we ever encounter them, to include
> > our X11R6 path-setting script.  That doesn't seem like a horrible
> > trade-off.
> >
> > Okay, go with the new scripts in /etc/profile.d/.
> >
> > Jehan - you sent in these scripts before, right?  Could you send them
> > again?  Thanks.
>
> Here they are.
> I renamed them 00xfree.* as suggested by Max Bowsher which I thing is
> even cleaner than having other scripts including the XFree script (which
> would mean that the script will have to keep its name whatever happens,
> it would be executed several times, ...).
>
>  From the bash man page:
> 	Pathname Expansion
> 		After  word  splitting, unless the -f option has been
> 		set, bash scans each word for the characters *, ?, and
> 		[. If one of these characters appears, then the word is
> 		regarded as a pattern, and replaced with an
> 		alphabetically sorted  list  of  file  names  matching
> 		the pattern.
>
>  From the tcsh man page:
> 	Filename substitution
> 		If a word contains any of the characters `*', `?', `['
> 		or `{' or begins with the character `~' it is  a
> 		candidate  for  filename substitution, also known as
> 		``globbing''.  This word is then regarded as a pattern
> 		(``glob-pattern''), and replaced with an alphabetically
> 		sorted list of file names which match the pattern
>
> So I think we could use this feature to ensure that the XFree script
> will be executed before any other scripts.
>
>
> 	Jehan
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]