This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???
- To: Peter Dalgaard BSA <p dot dalgaard at kubism dot ku dot dk>
- Subject: Re: What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???
- From: Bernd Schilpp <Bernd dot Schilpp at brokat dot de>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 16:17:44 +0200
- CC: Geoffrey Noer <noer at cygnus dot com>, gnu-win32 at cygnus dot com
- Organization: BROKAT Informationssysteme GmbH
- References: <199710152130.OAA20769@cirdan.cygnus.com> <x2en5lbyg7.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>
- Reply-To: Bernd dot Schilpp at brokat dot de
Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> Geoffrey Noer <noer@cygnus.com> writes:
>
> >
> > > Yes, I've tried that and it certainly seems to be a class act,
> > > although not as ambitious as cygwin32.
> >
> > From what I have heard, RSXNT sounds like it does significantly
> > less but isn't beta quality. I've also heard that nobody is actively
> > maintaining RSXNT -- anyone know differently?
>
> As far as I can tell, the author is still around, but hasn't posted
> anything on the net since the summer holidays. The current version is
> from March 97, so it's not exactly rapidly changing, but it's probably
> a bit early to declare it dead.
I know from Rainer Schnitker that there will be a new version (1.4) of
RSXNT with some improvements. But 1.4 will not come this October.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".