This is the mail archive of the email@example.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project. See the Cygwin
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Does GPL apply without Cygwin stub? [long and off-topic] (was Re: [ANN] Cygwin DEV survey)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Does GPL apply without Cygwin stub? [long and off-topic] (was Re: [ANN] Cygwin DEV survey)
- From: Chris Faylor <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 10:46:16 -0500
- Delivered-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-To: mailing list email@example.com
- In-Reply-To: <001901be6909$0c8aaeb0$cd3b4ec6@hunda>; from Suhaib M. Siddiqi on Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 09:11:57PM -0500
- Mailing-List: contact firstname.lastname@example.org; run by ezmlm
- Sender: email@example.com
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 09:11:57PM -0500, Suhaib M. Siddiqi wrote:
>>>If the program is not built using the cygwin stub, but /does/ link to the
>>>DLL using the OS' dynamic linking facility, does it still have to be
>>>distributed under the GPL?
>>I am not an expert but I believe that if you avoid using libcygwin.a and
>>(more importantly) crt0.o then you'd probably be safe.
>The crt0.o and cygwin1.dll comes with another commercial compiler too.
>I do not think the GPL is valid there, to get that you need to pay first???
If someone is distributing code which incorporates our crt0 file then it
*must* be GPLed.
If they are just distributing the crt0.o module and cygwin1.dll then they
must make source code available for both.
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org