This is the mail archive of the email@example.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project. See the Cygwin
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [ANN] Cygwin DEV survey
- To: "Smith, Martin" <martin@exchange.Scotland.NCR.com>
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Cygwin DEV survey
- From: Stipe Tolj <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 02:28:45 +0100
- CC: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Cygwin <email@example.com>
- Delivered-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-To: mailing list email@example.com
- Mailing-List: contact firstname.lastname@example.org; run by ezmlm
- Organization: Department of Economical Computer Science, University of Cologne, Germany
- References: <286215C2CA1AD211A13500A024535B5887C8E3@eukscpo3.Dundee.NCR.COM>
- Reply-To: email@example.com
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
Smith, Martin wrote:
> > Is it wise to change this to binary for a'development'
> > > install or not?
> > 8<
> > NO! The preferred method is text mounts.
> Oops - fair enough, I wasn't sure :-) I guess this implies there are a few
> packages out there aren't properly ported?
that's right. Some porters ease their porting efforts by switching to
binary mounts and hence don't keep track of file IO.
> An automated install tool (like InstallShield) should be able to detect
> which OS the software is being installed on and set up the appropriate
> settings for each. I take the point though that this might not cover all
> cases adequately.
InstallShield will set up all required env vars as much as the users
selects the packages to install. Hence a software detection for the
system is not that much necessary.
> [Martin] In theory an installer could ask the user what they wanted set up
> but, in practice, I agree this would probably be too much hassle. I
> certainly wouldn't recommend a windows installer as a panacea for all
> installation issues !
it will be capable of allowing to select packages not such dependency
checks as YaST from SuSE can do.
> True, all the tools in one place sounds handy :-) And, as you say, as long
> as people realise that this method of installation may not suit their
> particular needs then there's no problem...
Stipe Tolj <email@example.com>
Cygwin Porting Project
Department of Economical Computer Science
University of Cologne, Germany
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org